The
Truth About SIDS (Sudden Infant Death "Syndrome" )
Lendon H. Smith, MD with Joseph G. Hattersley, MA
June 27, 1999
Before World War II,
unexplained infant deaths were unusual. But after 1950, the government
required treatment of baby and child mattresses with fire retardant
chemicals. Sadly, doing so was counterproductive in two ways.
(1) It is well known that the number of baby deaths in home fires
grew substantially- in England, about ten-fold. (2) American "SIDS"
deaths ballooned 400-fold. The mechanism of death was identical
in both types of tragedy.
What is that mechanism?
A common, ordinarily harmless household fungus (Scopulariopsis
brevicaulis) and certain microorganisms consume the fire-retardant
phosphorus, arsenic and antimony in the mattress plasticizer.
While doing this, they emit the heavier-than-air neurotoxic gases
phosphine, arsine and stibine. Gas generation starts when mattress
and bedding warm to body temperature in contact with the baby's
body. Perspiration, dribble, urine, vomit and high (alkaline)
pH enable the fungus to grow rapidly. If the baby breathes a significant
amount of these nearly odorless gases for a prolonged time, the
central nervous system shuts down and the baby's life tragically
ends.
To prevent crib death,
an appropriate barrier is needed between mattress and baby. An
inexpensive slip-on mattress cover called BabeSafe® came to
market in 1996. Among tens of thousands sleeping on the product
in New Zealand and elsewhere, not one crib death has been reported.
In the interim, mothers can elevate the head end of the crib about
two inches, letting gases flow to the foot end and to the floor.
(A bassinet with impervious sides would trap gases.) A rolled
towel just south of baby’s rump prevents sliding; and ensures
that the baby sleeps face up.
This toxic gas hypothesis
was proposed by Barry Richardson, a British consulting scientist
and expert in materials degradation.[1] Dr. T. James Sprott --
whose success as consulting chemist and forensic scientist has
earned him great fame and respect in New Zealand -- corroborated
and strengthened the argument in his compelling book, The Cot
Death Cover-up? [2]
In Britain, crib death
risk doubles from the first to the second baby, and doubles again
from the second to the third. The fungal spores are established
during prior use; gas production starts sooner and in greater
volume. Infants of poor single mothers, with used mattresses and
bedding and high stresses of daily living, have seven times greater
risk than wealthy parents' babies. Output of toxic gases from
babies' mattresses declined rapidly in Britain after June 1989,
when Mr. Richardson dramatized the problem on BBC television.
Parents bought new mattresses and properly wrapped old ones. Manufacturers
removed the chemicals.
That ongoing, first-ever
decline in "SIDS" rate in Britain accelerated in December
1991, after publicity urging parents to put babies to sleep face
up. The toxic gas hypothesis explains the worldwide drop in crib
deaths that followed. Incidence in Britain (0.7 per thousand live
births) is now 70 percent lower than 1986-1988, when it was 2.3
per thousand. It is slightly below the rate of about 0.75 per
thousand in America. The British Limerick Commission investigated
the toxic gas hypothesis. If read carefully, states Dr. Sprott,
the tests reported in the Commission's analysis clearly confirm
the toxic gas hypothesis. However, its final report did not accurately
state those findings. This form of lying is, sadly, very common
throughout medical literature. The commissioners, who were already
biased against the theory, knew that telling the truth could subject
the British government to millions of pounds in liability lawsuits.
The truths sketched
out above will surprise the "experts," who for several
years shouted "Back to Sleep." Face up; a baby is less
likely to inhale toxic gases generated in the mattress. Then in
1995, sleeping on the back or side with a quilt was found to increase
"SIDS" risk nearly fourfold -- supposedly through smothering.
So the authorities reversed field again. Re-move bedding from
infant sleeping areas and dress baby warmly, they now say.
But that could multiply
"SIDS" tragedies in two ways.
(1) Babies did not
smother. But quilts contain phosphorus and/or antimony and are
seldom washed. So they can be infested with the same gas-generating
fungus discussed earlier, increasing risk in that way and further
explaining the 1995 result.
(2) Whatever raises
body temperature increases risk. Many boys have a faster metabolic
rate than girls; their slightly higher temperature promotes fungal
gas generation and higher "SIDS" risk. High room temperature
and facedown sleeping increase risk that way too. A fever can
increase gas generation tenfold or more; consumption of a processed-food
diet increases risk by weakening immunity leading to more infections
and fevers. Fever created by vaccinations may recur at known intervals
afterward, increasing risk on those days if the mattress is generating
the gases. Among Caucasian babies in New Zealand sleeping on BabeSafe®,
any fevers from vaccinations do no harm because these babies are
not exposed to toxic gases.
Vaccinations do increase
toxic gas exposure indirectly by weakening immunity and increasing
incidence of asthma.
(3) Similarly, overdressing
-- which authorities now endorse -- creates hyperthermia and traps
gases.
And in a house fire
the mercury can climb many hundreds of degrees, increasing gas
generation so much that the baby would be dead in seconds, before
the flames reach him.
BabeSafe® supplier:
David D. Davis, MD, 8381 El Paseo Grande, La Jolla, CA 92037.
1-619-456-5897.
Instructions, free
of charge: Dr. T.J. Sprott, 10 Combes Rd., Remuera, Auckland 5,
New Zealand.
www.cotlife2000.com
sprott@iconz.co.nz Phone & fax: 64-9-5231150
The manufacturers of
BabeSafe® mattress covers solicit expressions of interest
from overseas distributors. They are invited to contact Dr. Sprott.
www.babysake.com -
Distributor of Dr. Sprott's Babesafe covers
Note: The authors
have no financial relationship with any supplier.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REFERENCES:
[1] Richardson BA.
Sudden infant death syndrome: A possible primary cause. Jour Forensic
Science Society 1994;34:199-204.
[2] Sprott TJ. The
Cot Death Cover-up? Auckland: Penguin Environmental-NZ, 1996.
[3] Cookson WOCM, Moffatt
MF. Asthma: An epidemic in the absence of infec-tion? Science
1997; 275:41-42.
Return
to Information Library |